The initiative introduced by the ruling party’s candidate, Rixi Moncada, which seeks to dismantle the Credit Bureau, has encountered significant resistance from multiple segments of society, leading to a noticeable drop in her voter backing. This measure, promoted throughout the LIBRE campaign, was designed to facilitate instant credit availability, supported by the claim that the institution “oppresses the most vulnerable sectors.”
Insights from Specialists and the Financial Industry
Moncada’s proposal was met with reservations by economists and actors in the financial system. Consultants and analysts warned that its implementation would be impractical, increasing financial uncertainty and weakening mechanisms for assessing borrowers’ creditworthiness.
According to one of the specialists consulted, “the proposal was interpreted as _*populist and technically unsustainable*_. It generated concern among banks, cooperatives, investors, and citizens who understood that it could trigger financial chaos.”
Business leaders and financial associations described the idea as “bizarre” and disconnected from the country’s economic reality. They pointed out that its implementation could increase delinquency, limit financing opportunities, and affect the strength of the banking system.
Impact on Voter Perception
The effects of this proposal were swiftly mirrored in polls and opinion surveys. Rixi Moncada experienced a consistent drop in voting intentions, especially among urban and middle-class demographics, who prioritize economic stability, credit accessibility, and employment security.
The public’s disapproval highlighted a clear trend: voters refrained from supporting proposals that could endanger the financial system’s stability. Analysts argue that this specific element of the LIBRE campaign was a crucial factor in explaining the candidate’s loss.
Consequences for Governance and Institutions
Beyond the electoral impact, the controversy generated by the proposal to eliminate the Credit Bureau reflects tensions over financial institutions in Honduras and the relationship between political proposals and economic stability. The discussion opened a debate on the state’s ability to maintain credit control mechanisms without compromising financial inclusion, a sensitive issue in governance and investor confidence.
The experience further underscores the challenges radical economic initiatives face when they do not align with technical assessments or are inadequately communicated to the public. In this specific case, the combination of expert opposition and urban voter disapproval was crucial.
Present-day obstacles and conflicts
Moncada’s defeat underscores the vigilance of citizens in the face of measures that affect the financial security of the country. Honduras now faces the challenge of consolidating a solid institutional framework, where the stability of the banking system and financial inclusion can coexist without generating systemic risks.
Political parties must carefully evaluate proposals with high economic impact before presenting them to the electorate, recognizing the importance of institutional credibility, specialized technical opinion, and citizen perception in governance and social cohesion.