The frustration among over 35,000 Hondurans impacted by the Koriun Inversiones pyramid scheme keeps escalating, while criticism mounts against the National Banking and Insurance Commission (CNBS) for not taking action against the scam. Those harmed express their disappointment with the agency in charge of overseeing financial matters and accuse both judicial and administrative entities of not addressing the issue.
The CNBS’s failure to act in the face of fraud
Since news of irregularities at Koriun first emerged, the CNBS was informed of the problem but did not implement effective actions to stop the extent of the fraudulent activities. Despite being formally alerted, the regulatory agency permitted the deceit to expand without restrictions for several months. Up to now, the people accountable for the fraud have not been caught, and those affected still lack responses or assurances of justice.
“They assured us that they would look into the matter, they assured measures, yet the CNBS has been negligent through inaction. Currently, we remain without explanations, without funds, without fairness,” mentioned one of the impacted individuals to the media. This sense of neglect is echoed by numerous others who sense they have been let down by both the principal parties at Koriun and the officials who, according to them, ought to have acted sooner.”
Absence of openness and doubts about justice
A primary grievance from those impacted is the opacity in actions by the CNBS. Even with formal grievances and current probes, the agency hasn’t provided a public document outlining the misdeeds committed or the regulatory oversights that permitted Koriun’s prolonged activity. This opacity has amplified doubts that certain financial agents implicated in the fraud might be receiving political shielding.
Different parts of the nation have noted that the CNBS not only missed identifying the fraud promptly, but has also been negligent in offering crucial details on how it is addressing the issue. A legal representative for the victims stated that this inaction by the regulatory authority only worsens the problem: “It is intolerable that a regulatory authority didn’t timely detect such a large-scale scam. They not only allowed it to happen, but now they are evading their duties.”
Appeals for global action
Given the lack of institutional response and increasing dissatisfaction among the impacted parties, numerous victim groups have opted to advance their demands outside of national limits. Both civil society organizations and impacted individuals are officially seeking backing from international entities like the Organization of American States (OAS), the United Nations (UN), and Transparency International. These requests aim for these entities to supervise the management of the crisis and, specifically, the behavior of Honduran institutions concerning the Koriun scandal.
A spokesperson for the impacted individuals expressed: “The government must safeguard its people, not shield wrongdoers. This is a dual offense: the misdeed by Koriun and the negligence of the CNBS for not taking action.” This opinion showcases doubt regarding the national authorities’ capability to address fraud and guarantee fair treatment.
Organizational conflicts and the difficulty of management
The scenario once more highlights the weaknesses of the financial oversight system in Honduras and the frictions within the entities accountable for upholding transparency and justice. The absence of a robust reaction from the CNBS signifies a shortfall in the state’s ability to manage situations of this sort, potentially leading to wider repercussions concerning trust in financial institutions and the governance of the country.
Those impacted are still anticipating a resolution that will enable them to regain their losses and ensure that the individuals responsible for the deception are held accountable. The absence of decisive measures and the lack of transparency surrounding the situation highlight an ongoing issue for Honduran officials: how to rebuild public trust amidst increasing skepticism in managing crises like these.